Comments on: Google Chrome is interesting http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/ Jochem's tech exploits Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:06:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: film fan http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-41 film fan Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:57:58 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-41 there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it's speed, for example; now if only they would take care it's quirky cookie management... there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it’s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it’s quirky cookie management…

]]> By: katy http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-39 katy Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:42:37 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-39 Tests speed measurements on Google’s new browser Chrome with our application (http://www.taskwriter.com) shows that Chrome is faster then IE and just a little bit faster than Firefox 3.0. See the graphics: http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is Tests speed measurements on Google’s new browser Chrome with our application (http://www.taskwriter.com) shows that Chrome is faster then IE and just a little bit faster than Firefox 3.0. See the graphics: http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is

]]> By: PaulH http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-36 PaulH Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:50:08 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-36 @gopi, chrome passed all our unicode tests (and we have a *lot* of tests). and i just tested that paper website, displayed fine for me (even though i don't have a "meera" font installed & i didn't noticed a font family or any fallback ones in it's html goop). something wrong on your end. @gopi,

chrome passed all our unicode tests (and we have a *lot* of tests). and i just tested that paper website, displayed fine for me (even though i don’t have a “meera” font installed & i didn’t noticed a font family or any fallback ones in it’s html goop).

something wrong on your end.

]]> By: Dennis in MKE http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-35 Dennis in MKE Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:41:25 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-35 I do some website development so I was naturally curious about Chrome. I installed it on a Vista and XP machine and reviewed some of my websites. Here are the results: - Most everything worked perfectly and very fast as well. - One site got a "Bad Image" error message. This same site works perfectly in IE, Firefox,and Safari - The Vista machine could not play my Flash videos. The XP machine could. - I have a Halloween site that plays music on page load. It works perfectly with Internet Explorer AND CHROME, but not with Safari or Firefox. Go Figure... I do some website development so I was naturally curious about Chrome. I installed it on a Vista and XP machine and reviewed some of my websites. Here are the results:

- Most everything worked perfectly and very fast as well.

- One site got a “Bad Image” error message. This same site works perfectly in IE, Firefox,and Safari

- The Vista machine could not play my Flash videos. The XP machine could.

- I have a Halloween site that plays music on page load. It works perfectly with Internet Explorer AND CHROME, but not with Safari or Firefox.

Go Figure…

]]> By: Jochem http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-34 Jochem Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:59:08 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-34 The Adobe feeds give the same problem for me, but it appears it is a <a href="http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=138" rel="nofollow">known issue</a>. You may want to add a URL there to be sure they test it with the nect build. The Adobe feeds give the same problem for me, but it appears it is a known issue. You may want to add a URL there to be sure they test it with the nect build.

]]> By: Gopi Nathan http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-33 Gopi Nathan Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:16:55 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-33 Chrome doesn't display Unicode ... I tested with some newspapers like www.mathrubhumi.com and a simple page on my PC. It failed to display. Chrome doesn’t display Unicode … I tested with some newspapers like http://www.mathrubhumi.com and a simple page on my PC. It failed to display.

]]> By: PaulH http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-32 PaulH Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:19:35 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-32 did you try chrome w/adobe feeds? keep seeing "Error 320 (net::ERR_INVALID_RESPONSE): Unknown error." when i try to click on a link. i was pleasantly surprised too about flash. thought for sure they'd try to croak flash. it passed all our unicode tests (though it defaults to latin-1). doesn't seem to use it's own "glyph of last resort" like FF3, buzzword, etc. do (ie something other than boxes & question marks). going to run some tests against some of our flex apps. did you try chrome w/adobe feeds? keep seeing “Error 320 (net::ERR_INVALID_RESPONSE): Unknown error.” when i try to click on a link.

i was pleasantly surprised too about flash. thought for sure they’d try to croak flash.

it passed all our unicode tests (though it defaults to latin-1). doesn’t seem to use it’s own “glyph of last resort” like FF3, buzzword, etc. do (ie something other than boxes & question marks).

going to run some tests against some of our flex apps.

]]>