Comments for "it could be bunnies" http://jochem.vandieten.net Jochem's tech exploits Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:08:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 Comment on Google Chrome is interesting by Dennis in MKE http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-35 Dennis in MKE Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:41:25 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-35 I do some website development so I was naturally curious about Chrome. I installed it on a Vista and XP machine and reviewed some of my websites. Here are the results: - Most everything worked perfectly and very fast as well. - One site got a "Bad Image" error message. This same site works perfectly in IE, Firefox,and Safari - The Vista machine could not play my Flash videos. The XP machine could. - I have a Halloween site that plays music on page load. It works perfectly with Internet Explorer AND CHROME, but not with Safari or Firefox. Go Figure... I do some website development so I was naturally curious about Chrome. I installed it on a Vista and XP machine and reviewed some of my websites. Here are the results:

- Most everything worked perfectly and very fast as well.

- One site got a “Bad Image” error message. This same site works perfectly in IE, Firefox,and Safari

- The Vista machine could not play my Flash videos. The XP machine could.

- I have a Halloween site that plays music on page load. It works perfectly with Internet Explorer AND CHROME, but not with Safari or Firefox.

Go Figure…

]]> Comment on Google Chrome is interesting by Jochem http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-34 Jochem Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:59:08 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-34 The Adobe feeds give the same problem for me, but it appears it is a <a href="http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=138" rel="nofollow">known issue</a>. You may want to add a URL there to be sure they test it with the nect build. The Adobe feeds give the same problem for me, but it appears it is a known issue. You may want to add a URL there to be sure they test it with the nect build.

]]> Comment on Google Chrome is interesting by Gopi Nathan http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-33 Gopi Nathan Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:16:55 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-33 Chrome doesn't display Unicode ... I tested with some newspapers like www.mathrubhumi.com and a simple page on my PC. It failed to display. Chrome doesn’t display Unicode … I tested with some newspapers like http://www.mathrubhumi.com and a simple page on my PC. It failed to display.

]]> Comment on Google Chrome is interesting by PaulH http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-32 PaulH Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:19:35 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-is-interesting/#comment-32 did you try chrome w/adobe feeds? keep seeing "Error 320 (net::ERR_INVALID_RESPONSE): Unknown error." when i try to click on a link. i was pleasantly surprised too about flash. thought for sure they'd try to croak flash. it passed all our unicode tests (though it defaults to latin-1). doesn't seem to use it's own "glyph of last resort" like FF3, buzzword, etc. do (ie something other than boxes & question marks). going to run some tests against some of our flex apps. did you try chrome w/adobe feeds? keep seeing “Error 320 (net::ERR_INVALID_RESPONSE): Unknown error.” when i try to click on a link.

i was pleasantly surprised too about flash. thought for sure they’d try to croak flash.

it passed all our unicode tests (though it defaults to latin-1). doesn’t seem to use it’s own “glyph of last resort” like FF3, buzzword, etc. do (ie something other than boxes & question marks).

going to run some tests against some of our flex apps.

]]> Comment on PostgreSQL 8.3 released by Aalok Shelar http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/02/05/postgresql-83-released/#comment-29 Aalok Shelar Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:27:09 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/02/05/postgresql-83-released/#comment-29 Indeed a very helpful post. I would like to have more info on HOT. Indeed a very helpful post. I would like to have more info on HOT.

]]> Comment on Reserved names for cookies by Brad Wood http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-28 Brad Wood Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:16:29 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-28 Here's my latest solution to this problem. So far it works locally on my machine. http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2008/7/15/No-Cookie-For-You-Second-Solution Here’s my latest solution to this problem. So far it works locally on my machine.

http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2008/7/15/No-Cookie-For-You-Second-Solution

]]> Comment on Reserved names for cookies by Brad Wood http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-27 Brad Wood Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:00:04 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-27 Here is the servlet filter to remove cookies: http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2008/7/11/Java-Servlet-Filters-Part-2-Removing-Cookies That didn't solve the problem, and this is what I found: http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2008/7/11/Cookie-Reserved-Names-Whos-to-blame Here is the servlet filter to remove cookies:
http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2008/7/11/Java-Servlet-Filters-Part-2-Removing-Cookies

That didn’t solve the problem, and this is what I found:
http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2008/7/11/Cookie-Reserved-Names-Whos-to-blame

]]> Comment on Reserved names for cookies by Brad Wood http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-26 Brad Wood Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:50:43 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-26 Jochem, I'm in the process of blogging my finds now, but the short story is I successfully wrote a servlet filter to remove cookies from the httpServletRequest object before ColdFusion got it, but it didn't work becuase JRUN is where the cookies get parsed and the log files are appended BEFORE any servlet filters are run. I tracked it down to the javax.servlet.http.Cookie class (which is thankfully open source) and sure enough, an IllegalArgumentException error is thrown when the cookie name is a in a list of reserved names. Check out the code at http://kickjava.com/src/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java.htm. The best Adobe could do would be to not log errors returned by the Cookie class constructor. In the mean time, I posted this question to the Sun Java forum to see if anyone could provide some history. http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5313146 ~Brad Jochem, I’m in the process of blogging my finds now, but the short story is I successfully wrote a servlet filter to remove cookies from the httpServletRequest object before ColdFusion got it, but it didn’t work becuase JRUN is where the cookies get parsed and the log files are appended BEFORE any servlet filters are run. I tracked it down to the javax.servlet.http.Cookie class (which is thankfully open source) and sure enough, an IllegalArgumentException error is thrown when the cookie name is a in a list of reserved names. Check out the code at http://kickjava.com/src/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java.htm.

The best Adobe could do would be to not log errors returned by the Cookie class constructor. In the mean time, I posted this question to the Sun Java forum to see if anyone could provide some history. http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5313146

~Brad

]]> Comment on Reserved names for cookies by Jochem http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-25 Jochem Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:19:54 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-25 I filed an enhancement request with Adobe with the following text: <blockquote>Ignore logging of "domain", "expires" etc. cookies When CF (JRun?) receives a request with cookies named "domain", "expires" etc. it logs an error in *-event.log. This needlessly clutters the logfile with something that isn't really an error (the Netscape cookie proposal, RFC 2109 and RFC 2695 all allow those cookie names). Please allow us to switch off logging of these cookies (and disable this logging by default).</blockquote> I filed an enhancement request with Adobe with the following text:

Ignore logging of “domain”, “expires” etc. cookies

When CF (JRun?) receives a request with cookies named “domain”, “expires” etc. it logs an error in *-event.log. This needlessly clutters the logfile with something that isn’t really an error (the Netscape cookie proposal, RFC 2109 and RFC 2695 all allow those cookie names). Please allow us to switch off logging of these cookies (and disable this logging by default).

]]> Comment on Reserved names for cookies by Brad Wood http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-24 Brad Wood Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:02:08 +0000 http://jochem.vandieten.net/2008/07/03/reserved-names-for-cookies/#comment-24 Dang it Charlie, now you've turned me on to servlet filters! :) I've always known what they did, but never considered trying to write one. I think I'm gonna' try to make a filter to get rid of certain cookies like you said-- if for nothing else than to see how it would work. I'll blog it if I can figure it out. ~Brad Dang it Charlie, now you’ve turned me on to servlet filters! :) I’ve always known what they did, but never considered trying to write one. I think I’m gonna’ try to make a filter to get rid of certain cookies like you said– if for nothing else than to see how it would work. I’ll blog it if I can figure it out.

~Brad

]]>